<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[AmQuake Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/index.php</link>
		<atom:link href="http://forums.amquake.eu/extern.php?action=feed&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent topics at AmQuake Forums.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Calculate period of the idealized SDOF system]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=82&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />could you please answer me the following questions:</p><p>Is it posible and where in AmQuake to calculate period of the idealized SDOF system T* , and how to see it? <br />Is it posible and where to calculate period of real 3d geometry system, and how to see it? </p><p>Thank you!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ABserklaž)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 10:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=82&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Height of piers and seismic verification condition]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=74&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>could you please answer me the following 2 questions:</p><p>- why is the seismic verification for ULS preformed through the check d(n)&gt;=pd*dtULS. Is this according to EC? In EC I cannot find any additional parameter pd=1,5.</p><p>- which height of piers is taken into account for the seismic analysis. For example, if I have a pier situated between 2 windows, is the height of the pier reduced or is its height taken as the elevation height?</p><p>Thank you!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pannkaka)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=74&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Prototype vs. model]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=73&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p><p>One quick question. Is AmQuake intended to test only prototypes i.e. full size structures, or is it suitable for models as well e.g. “full size / 5”</p><p>More questions coming up!</p><p>Cheers, Robert</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (robb)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=73&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mesh generation]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=34&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When the option &quot;Ceilings without bending stiffness&quot; is inactive i.e. when the program takes the bending stiffness i account, how is the stiffness calculated and taken in the calculation for different nodes?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (concordia2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=34&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[DLS output explanation]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=32&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d like to have documented the &quot;CF_damage&quot; and the &quot;Damage status&quot; (together w/ its options: SD, FD, MV, M, V) in the View menu. Could you please quickly point me to some links or dox explaining what are these about (eventually how is the software calculating these)?<br />Thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (BogdanDum)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=32&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Target displacement restriction]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=31&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In EC 8 Annex Condition 6 says:<br />dt&lt;3det<br />When the program calculates the target displacement, the analysis isn&#039;t stoped after reaching this condition. In some examples I made the model fit the ag requirement although condition 6 was not met. Any info would be helpful <br />Thx in advance</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (concordia2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 21:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=31&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Import DXF]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=30&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In version 1.20 I&#039;ve discovered some problems with DXF import. The problem is that &quot;Import DXF&quot; dialog can&#039;t accept previously defined materials. This problem appears when selecting previously defined wall material and parapet material. </p><p>It is possible to use the option to import new material properties and they are accepted, but you need to import new material property every time you use &quot;Import DXF&quot;&nbsp; so you end up with at least 5-6 material properties for one type of wall.</p><p>I&#039;ve been using almoust every version of AmQuake so far, and &quot;Import DXF&quot; dialog worked correctly in every version except version 1.20. I hope that it will be fixed soon.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (navi33)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=30&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Coef. of cracked wall stiffness]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=26&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Coef. of cracked wall stiffness&nbsp; =&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This&nbsp; &nbsp; parameter&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;defines&nbsp; &nbsp; the&nbsp; &nbsp;reduction&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;of&nbsp; initial wall stiffness due to the tensile cracking. The recommended value is 0.50 (see EN 1998-1, Section 4.3.1 (7)). </p><p>How is this parameter taken into account during the calculation. Is the cross section stiffness automaticly reduced to 1/2 in the begining or is this factor included somehow else?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (concordia2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=26&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Calculation output]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=13&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to get the values of:<br />1. Gamma - Transformation factor between MDOF and SDOF<br />2. m_eq - Equivalent mass of SDOF</p><p>I have been searching trough the calculation output and software documentation.<br />It looks like that there is no way of getting these crucial values from the resources currently available. <br />I need Gamma and m_eq values to round up the presentation of Amquake&#039;s pushover analysis for my project.</p><p>Regards</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (navi33)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=13&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Old version validation examples]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=12&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi i tried to run the provided validation examples in the new version of amquake and the results differ a lot including some examples not even reaching the target displacement, whereas in the old version they had ag resistance 0,3<br />Thx in advance</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (concordia2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=12&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Print statement issue]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=7&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />every time when i try to print the results into rtf file with a model that has more then one floor the program crashes. This happens when i try to print the dispacements of the ULS step and when I include any of the results with all steps included. Is there a way to get the results into a .txt file or any other form that can be used for modifying?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (concordia2)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=7&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Upgrade policy]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=5&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I would like to know what your upgrade policy is.</p><p>Are&nbsp; both the minor and major upgrades free, or do you charge extra for major upgrades? If so, how much will you charge for major upgrades?</p><p>Thank you.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hlaci)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=5&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Data input question]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=4&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When introducing wall elements, should these elements intersect or should they only be tangent?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (hlaci)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=4&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Welcome to AmQuake forum]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=3&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear AmQuake users:</p><p>I would like to welcome you to this newly established forum for exchaging information, comments and experiences with our new software AmQuake.</p><p>AmQuake program can evaluate a masonry building regarding its seismic safety. It is based on EC8, EC6 and EC2 taking into account national annexes of 10 European countries. It is using a pushover analysis combined with equivalent frame method to evaluate the structural safety during earthquakes.</p><p>We encourage you to submit your comments, questions or experiences into this forum so that other engineers can use it as an additional source of usefull information about the program.</p><p>We sincerely hope that you will like our program, and we are looking forward to you suggestions for future improvements.</p><p>With best regards</p><p>Jan Cervenka<br />CEO Cervenka Consulting, LTD, <br />Na Hrebenkach 55<br />Prague, Czech Republic</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcervenka)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=3&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Buying licence ?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=2&amp;action=new</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to buy a licence of this new program. Who should I pay money for licence?</p><p>I hope that this program works without big or importand mistakes or bugs?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jure1503)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://forums.amquake.eu/viewtopic.php?id=2&amp;action=new</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

